Thursday 21 August 2008

Risk Assessment Plays Key Role In Long-Term Treatment Of Breast Cancer

� Breast cancer patients and their physicians may make more informed, semipermanent treatment decisions using risk of infection assessment strategies to help determine chance of recurrence, a inquiry team lED by scientists at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center reported in the Aug. 12 online issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.


The 2,838 women studied were diagnosed with Stage I through III knocker cancers and had been treated with adjuvant systemic therapy (AST), such as chemotherapy and or tamoxifen between 1985 and 2001, and were in the M. D. Anderson Tumor Registry. The patients in the study were cinque years from the begin of their AST and were cancer-free. The researchers calculated the residual or remaining risk of return from the benchmark of five eld from the start of AST and determined the factors that contributed to a higher residual risk of recurrence.


"Understandably, one of the most common questions posed by bosom cancer survivors is 'What are the chances of it approaching back?'," said the study's leading author, Abenaa Brewster, M.D., assistant prof in M. D. Anderson's Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention. "Now we can buoy tell some women within a certain percentage their future endangerment of recurrence and clinicians may be able to make more informed decisions regarding prescription of prolonged adjuvant endocrine therapy."


Data analysis revealed that 89 percent of the study populations did not feel a recurrence at five-spot years (about 10 years after a woman's initial diagnosis), and 80 percent did non experience a recurrence at 10 years (approximately 15 years after diagnosis).


Brewster commented that, while reassuring for most of the five-year survivors, the per centum of the population world Health Organization had a recurrence is significant to oncologists.


"The magnitude of risk of recurrence should indicate a need for us to consider extensive endocrine treatment for eligible women to further lower their risks," said Brewster. Additionally, the study did not include women wHO received adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzamab or five-spot years of aromatase inhibitor treatment and therefore the residual risk of exposure of recurrence among those groups of patients could not be determined.


Median follow-up time for women in the study was 28 months. During that time, 216 of the women experient a recurrence. The five-year residual risks of return for patients with Stage I, II and III cancers were 7 percent, 11 pct and 13 percent severally. Patients with Stage II or III versus Stage I disease and patients with mark I versus grade III tumors had a higher risk of late return. Patients wHO had oestrogen receptor-positive tumors who received adjuvant ductless gland therapy as well had a higher risk of recurrence than those with hormone receptor-negative tumors but the difference was not found to gather statistical significance.


The study also indicated a demand for the continued ontogeny of risk-reduction strategies for pre-menopausal knocker cancer survivors because of lack of available therapies in this younger age group. Currently, extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole (Femara) is available only for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive tumors who have completed basketball team years of tamoxifen therapy.


Co-authors with Brewster are: Francisco J. Esteva, M.D., Ph.D.; Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, M.D.; Banu K. Arun, M.D.; Aman U. Buzdar, M.D.; Daniel J. Booser, M.D.; Vicente Valero, M.D.; and Shu-Wan C. Kau, B.S.N. of M. D. Anderson's Department of Breast Medical Oncology; Melissa L. Bondy, Ph.D., of M. D. Anderson's Department of Epidemiology; Kristine R. Broglio of M. D. Anderson's Division of Quantitative Sciences; and Cesar A. Santa-Maria of The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

About M. D. Anderson


The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston ranks as one of the world's most respected centers focused on cancer patient care, research, education and prevention. M. D. Anderson is one of only 41 Comprehensive Cancer Centers designated by the National Cancer Institute. For captain Hicks of the past nine years, M. D. Anderson has graded No. 1 in cancer care in "America's Best Hospitals," a survey published annually in U.S. News and World Report.

University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center


More info